Below, you will find a concise list of the current working papers and projects I am currently pursuing.
Please note that this is a brief overview of my ongoing work. If you would like to delve into the details on any specific project or paper, please do not hesitate to ask.
Working Papers
“Just Quit: How Hope Influences an Individual's Persistence Levels'' (with M.A Palma and P. Feldman)
Abstract: In the face of evolving labor markets and compensation structures, understanding how payment instruments with uncertainty in value affect worker productivity is relevant for academics and practitioners. This paper explores the behavioral impacts of two lottery-based bonus payments versus a certain bonus payment on individual productivity in real-effort tasks. Previous investigations yield mixed results and are often implemented in the field or with incentive payments of with different expected values. We implement a laboratory experiment to test one fixed payment with a $1 sure bonus payment and two lottery payment schemes of equivalent expected value but different risk (1% of $100 and 91% of $1.10) to provide a controlled test. We find individuals behave as expected utility maximizers, completing significantly more shapes of 8.93% (HpLr) to 19.4% (LpHr) under fixed payments. Participants with a high probability of low reward complete 11.5% more shapes than in the low probability of high reward treatment.
“Jackpot for Good: Can Lottery Matches Increase Charitable Giving?” (with J.N. Lahey and M.A Palma )
Abstract: We investigate the impact of matching gift schemes using lotteries, in which the lottery match would benefit the charity, on charitable giving. We recruit 1,402 online participants to investigate the effects in seven conditions: “No Match" (Control), two sets of matching schemes of varying equivalent expected values: EV=1 (1:1 Match, 1:10% of 10 tokens, and 1:1% of 100) and EV=0.5 (2:1 Match, 1:1% of 50 tokens and 1:0.5% of 100), where a token is $0.50. Participants complete three 10-token allocation decisions for hunger-related charities and one allocation is randomly selected for realization. The 1:1 matching significantly increases giving by 15.7% compared to No Match. We find that matching schemes with a small probability of a very large amount (1% and 0.5% of 100) have significantly higher rates of giving compared to No Match (p=0.02 and p=0.10 respectively) and do not statistically differ from the 1:1 matching (p=0.98 and p=0.62 respectively). Our results have economic significance for non-profits to fundraise at lower fundraising costs while increasing donations via matching.
Works in Progress
“Evaluation of the Effects of Attachment Priming on Food Preferences'' (with M.A. Palma and C. D. Rethorst)
Project Status: Pilot data from 140 participants was collected at two locations (HBL in College Station, TX and AgriLife Healthy Living office in Dallas, TX). Main experiment is awaiting data collection, anticipated Fall 2024.
“The Giving Jackpot'' (with J.N. Lahey, M.A. Palma and others)
Project Status: Extension of working paper, “Jackpot for Good” currently in development.
“Oklahoma State University Extension Needs Assessment'' (with J.L. Lusk)
Project Status: In development. Data collection anticipated October-November 2024.